To content | To menu | To search

Turkey

Remember, remember the 6 of September..

It was characterised as the ''Second St. Bartholomew's night'' because of the wrath of the masses and the total destruction. After that night nothing was the same for the Greeks of Istanbul, the ''Constantinopolites''..

55 years after the ''September events'', Cafebabel Greece remembers and calls the whole of Europe to remember as well...

Continue reading ...

Alloianoi as science fiction myth... thanks to the need for Turkeys' economic growth...

The ancient Greek city of Alloianoi of the 2nd century BC will probably pass into oblivion in the following days, after the new approval received by the Office of the State Water Management in Turkey, to bury it under tons of sand, in order to continue work on creating dam in the area. Despite the

Continue reading ...

The secret agreement between Erdogan and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew

Before about a year, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited the Büyükada island, next to Istanbul. He became the first Turkish prime minister who went there in order to visit the famous Orphanage. Mr Erdogan met with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, in a move that proved to be something more than symbolic. The Prime Minister of Turkey and the Ecumenical Patriarch then put the foundations of an informal agreement with mutual benefit. The first would open the door to meet demands of the Patriarchate, while the second would greatly improve the external testimony over the issue of religious freedoms, critical to Turkey's European perspective.

Athens welcomed the "positive steps" made by Ankara towards the Ecumenical Patriarchate and believes that Turkey moves to the "right direction", said Mr. D. Droutsas, after his meeting with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew who firstly met with the Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu. On his part, Mr Bartholomew said after the meeting that the problems facing the Ecumenical Patriarchate "are being solved one after another, 'and spoke of" steady progress in the right direction on the part of the Turkish government. "

Observers of the "difficult relations" between Ankara and Fener (the headquarters of the Ecumenical Patriarchate) note that four were the key points of understanding between Mr. Bartholomew and Mr. Erdogan. They also promote the important role played by the intervention of U.S. President Barack Obama during his visit to Turkey in the spring of 2009.

The first issue concerned the acceptance of the Ecumenicity of the Patriarchate and non-interference in religious matters. Regarding this, very important was the statement of Mr Erdogan during his visit to Athens last May. "If it bothers me that the title Ecumenical Patriarch? Of course not. It didnt bothered my predecessors, my forefathers, why would annoy me?" was his answer to a question.

The second issue was the recognition of legal personality of the Patriarchate. Focal point is the actual acceptance by Ankara of the decision of European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) for the return of Büyükada Orphanage to the Patriarchate. Essentially, the ECHR has acknowledged with this decision the legal personality of the Patriarchate, which can own the property.

The third point was the government intervention in the matter of the election of a Patriarch. Ankara decided to grant the Turkish citizenship to members of the Holy Synod who do not have it, in order to facilitate the choice of a new Patriarch when it is needed (Turkish law requires the possession of the Turkish citizenship to elect a Patriarch).

The fourth and final point is the reopening of the Halki Theological School. This, according to diplomatic sources is a in Ankara and will sell it cheap. Already, however, Turkish officials have prepared the ground with their statements, and the recent exhibition which was organised in the School, since Istanbul is the cultural capital of Europe, has further increased expectations.

Source : To Vima (original in Greek, translation by Cafebabel Greece)

Hellenic Foreign Policy : ''Quo vadis''???

These days in Greece, there is a peculiar sentiment over President Obama's visit in Turkey. Athens believed that bilateral relations with the US will enter in a new era, something which is actually happening...in Turkey!
Therefore, the Greek Foreign Policy didn't know how to react to this american-turkish flirt. It is clear that Obama is trying to promote a new role for Turkey which seems to be the ideal example of a western muslim republic. After Obama's personal involvement in order to persuade Turkey to accept the Danish PM as the new NATO secretary general and the public support of the Turkish candidancy in the EU, the Turks welcomed Obama as a rock-star. Meanwhile, the Greek diplomacy managed to arrange a meeting between PM Karamanlis and President Obama one day before his trip to Turkey, during the NATO summit in Strasbourg - Kehl.
According to my point of view this was a child-like reaction of the Greek diplomacy : Greece realised that now the US dont regard that Turkey and Greece as a ''package'', which seems to be the reality. Greece is regarded as a European country- no matter it's ''peculiar'' characteristics and weaknesses. Apparently, Turkey is not treated that way : Turkey is a huge country, three times the size of Greece, inhabited by eight million people, which neighbours with the sensitive Middle East area and forms a mixture of a western- even weak- republic and the islamic tradition.
The US seem to believe that Turkey can have a key-role in the area, by being the model of the other islamic states.
The question which rises, is not what Turkey is doing in order to strengthen her position worldwide, but what Greece does or not in order to strenghthen its very own position. In most international fora, Greece has only issues of ''national importance'' in the agenda, meaning : Greco-turkish relations, the Cyprus issue and the name of FYROM.
On the contrary, when issues of international interest are on the top of the meetings, Greece doesn't seem to have a position, we just adopt the thesis of our partners. Even in the way we treat our national issues, we do so, by asking the foreigner to take a position in favor of our own ''lawful'', ''true'', ''rightful'' or ''historical'' demands. We are acting like if international fora were a Holy Synod or a meeting of Saints, where issues are solved according to the ''rights of God''. Unfortunately they are not like this, and we should finally understand that the world is not spinning around our national demands and rights. National issues are extremely important and we should give our best in order to promote them but when you have to face international problems like economic repression, climate change, Iraq, Darfur or nuclear weapons you have to have a position. In order to be ''one'' and not''someone'' you have to have a voice, you have to have proposals. You have to see the world, try to understand it and foresee your position within it in the future. This is foreign policy. Otherwise, you will wondering in every recognition of ''Macedonia'' or ''Nothern Cyprus'' or in every trip of every Obama in every Erdogan.

Entries feed - Comments feed